From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-16 04:27:42
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Can you then please mark the failure as expected in the 1_34_0 branch ?
> No matter the actual cause, it's *not* a regression and there is really
> no point looking into any additional fixes at this time.
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk