From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-16 08:09:40
Thomas Witt wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> Can you then please mark the failure as expected in the 1_34_0
>> branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's *not* a regression and
>> there is really no point looking into any additional fixes at this
I just marked it.
Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the release since it
won't change the actual release content.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk