|
Boost : |
From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-16 08:09:40
Thomas Witt wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>
>> Can you then please mark the failure as expected in the 1_34_0
>> branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's *not* a regression and
>> there is really no point looking into any additional fixes at this
>> time.
>
> Agreed.
>
Indeed.
I just marked it.
Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the release since it
won't change the actual release content.
Fernando
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk