From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 08:28:28
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
>> Thomas Witt wrote:
>>> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>>> Can you then please mark the failure as expected in
>>>> the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's
>>>> *not* a regression and there is really no point
>>>> looking into any additional fixes at this time.
>> I just marked it.
>> Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the
>> release since it won't change the actual release content.
> Fernando, seems like these two new errors
> are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might
> want to mark them as expected failures.
Right. I just marked them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk