Re: [boost] [Report] 2 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-04-14)

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 08:28:28

Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Thomas Witt wrote:
>>> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can you then please mark the failure as expected in
>>>> the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's
>>>> *not* a regression and there is really no point
>>>> looking into any additional fixes at this time.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>> Indeed.
>> I just marked it.
>>
>> Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the
>> release since it won't change the actual release content.
>
> Fernando, seems like these two new errors
>
Indeed.

>
> http://tinyurl.com/2hg96q
> http://tinyurl.com/yujpdk
>
> are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might
> want to mark them as expected failures.
>
Right. I just marked them.

Thanks

Fernando