From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 05:01:36
Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> > Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you then please mark the failure as expected in
> > > the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's
> > > *not* a regression and there is really no point
> > > looking into any additional fixes at this time.
> > Agreed.
> I just marked it.
> Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the
> release since it won't change the actual release content.
Fernando, seems like these two new errors
are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might
want to mark them as expected failures.
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk