Re: [boost] [Report] 2 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-04-14)

From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 05:01:36

Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
> 
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> > Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you then please mark the failure as expected in
> > > the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's
> > > *not* a regression and there is really no point
> > > looking into any additional fixes at this time.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> Indeed.
> I just marked it.
> 
> Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the
> release since it won't change the actual release content.

Fernando, seems like these two new errors

http://tinyurl.com/2hg96q
http://tinyurl.com/yujpdk

are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might
want to mark them as expected failures.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo