Boost logo

Boost :

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-27 15:18:54

On 04/27/2007 01:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Maurizio Vitale wrote:
>>What is the rationale for not having proto::tags match the corresponding
>>mpl metafunctions?
>>For instance mpl has plus and proto has add (but unary_plus).
> Oh my. You're right, that's awful. I'll fix these.
Well, as long as you're aiming for consistency, why not
do the following renames:

   proto::_ -> proto::true_

   proto::not_<_> -> proto::false_


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at