From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-27 15:18:54
On 04/27/2007 01:17 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Maurizio Vitale wrote:
>>What is the rationale for not having proto::tags match the corresponding
>>For instance mpl has plus and proto has add (but unary_plus).
> Oh my. You're right, that's awful. I'll fix these.
Well, as long as you're aiming for consistency, why not
do the following renames:
proto::_ -> proto::true_
proto::not_<_> -> proto::false_
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk