Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-27 14:17:37

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] how to get preprocessor output with boost build.v2 (was Re: boost::proto documentation for transforms"
Previous message: Maurizio Vitale: "Re: [boost] how to get preprocessor output with boost build.v2 (was Re: boost::proto documentation for transforms"
In reply to: Maurizio Vitale: "[boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Next in thread: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Reply: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Reply: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [proto] new version, breaking changes (was: proto::tag naming convention)"

Maurizio Vitale wrote:
> What is the rationale for not having proto::tags match the corresponding
> mpl metafunctions?
>
> For instance mpl has plus and proto has add (but unary_plus).

Oh my. You're right, that's awful. I'll fix these.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] how to get preprocessor output with boost build.v2 (was Re: boost::proto documentation for transforms"
Previous message: Maurizio Vitale: "Re: [boost] how to get preprocessor output with boost build.v2 (was Re: boost::proto documentation for transforms"
In reply to: Maurizio Vitale: "[boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Next in thread: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Reply: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] proto::tag naming convention"
Reply: Eric Niebler: "[boost] [proto] new version, breaking changes (was: proto::tag naming convention)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk