Re: [boost] [rpc/marshal] prototype rpc / marshal libraryusing asio and serialization (and futures in the future?)

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 08:19:59

I second this. I've written a light rpc framework and a futures-like thing was the main point of interaction.

Where is your futures library anyway?

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Braddock Gaskill
Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 4:16 AM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] [rpc/marshal] prototype rpc / marshal libraryusing	asio and serialization (and futures in the future?)
 
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:48:31 -0700, Stjepan Rajko wrote:
> I guess the consensus is that there is use for both sync and async aspects,
> and both should be

I personally would suggest looking at how futures can make the async/sync
elements easier.