From: Braddock Gaskill (braddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 12:30:32
On Tue, 01 May 2007 05:19:59 -0700, Sohail Somani wrote:
> I second this. I've written a light rpc framework and a futures-like thing
> was the main point of interaction.
> Where is your futures library anyway?
My futures library is at:
It is still early.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Braddock Gaskill
> Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 4:16 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [rpc/marshal] prototype rpc / marshal libraryusing asio and serialization (and futures in the future?)
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:48:31 -0700, Stjepan Rajko wrote:
>> I guess the consensus is that there is use for both sync and async aspects,
>> and both should be
> I personally would suggest looking at how futures can make the async/sync
> elements easier.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk