|
Boost : |
From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-01 16:24:11
In article <0CB5B4BF-D924-4605-B47D-3B5EEB38B7EA_at_[hidden]> Doug
Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> While we should probably fix this behavior of "configure" to do the
> same thing as an autoconf-generated "configure", I don't think that
> this problem makes having a "configure" script any less of a good
> idea. The "configure" script handles the common case very well; it's
> much easier for people accustomed to *nix software than bjam will
> ever be.
Agreed.
Thomas
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk