From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-02 08:37:05
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Tue May 01 2007, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-mmltd.net> wrote:
>> Jeff Garland wrote:
>>> BTW, I don't know if this has been discussed much, but the plan for
>>> subversion switchover, as I understand it, is to take 1.34 as the
>>> svn HEAD and force all work unstable stuff on the CVS HEAD to be
>>> brought over using the new process.
>> That would be very impolite. :-)
> I'm not sure this transition *can* be a "polite" process if it's going
> to work. That said, I'm open to suggestions.
Let me get this straight... you will be throwing all of my post-1.34 changes
away with the transition? What are the expected benefits of this move?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk