From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-02 08:42:27
Peter Dimov wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Tue May 01 2007, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-mmltd.net> wrote:
>>> Jeff Garland wrote:
>>>> BTW, I don't know if this has been discussed much, but the plan for
>>>> subversion switchover, as I understand it, is to take 1.34 as the
>>>> svn HEAD and force all work unstable stuff on the CVS HEAD to be
>>>> brought over using the new process.
>>> That would be very impolite. :-)
>> I'm not sure this transition *can* be a "polite" process if it's going
>> to work. That said, I'm open to suggestions.
> Let me get this straight... you will be throwing all of my post-1.34 changes
> away with the transition? What are the expected benefits of this move?
In my reading there is a big difference between 'bring over' and 'throw away'.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk