From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-06 05:46:10
Nicola Musatti wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> I doubt Boost.Build can be decoupled much more. We have our own mailing
>> list, our own issue tracker, our own webpage and our own releases.
>> The only coupling is that Boost.Build lives in Boost CVS, and I'm not
>> sure if that's bad thing, or good thing.
> The problem is that from the outside it is often unclear which problems
> concern BB itself and which concern its use. If you allow me a parallel,
> it is hard to distinguish when you fix make from when you fix the
So, you suggest it would be better to freeze Boost.Build version used
by a particular Boost release, which would mean that in case of
any issues you get to fix Jamfiles?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk