From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-06 12:46:15
On 6 May 2007, at 14:37, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Matthias Troyer wrote:
>> On 5 May 2007, at 06:16, Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> * I agree that the time(0) seed is unacceptable. A good source of
>>> probably deserves its own library. It's also not easy to make it
>>> header-only. One compromise could be for the create function to
>>> take an
>>> Engine argument, but this takes away the simplicity.
>> How about just adding an additional create function that takes an
> The existing create function is dangerous as it doesn't generate
> unique identifiers. We can't fix that by adding more overloads.
I fully agree that it is very dangerous, especially on parallel
machines. However, in addition to fixing this, it would be good to
have the engine be customizable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk