Re: [boost] boost::mem_fn suggestion/question

From: Marcus Lindblom (macke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 03:38:41

Piyo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was using boost::mem_fun and noticed that only with the 1 or 2
> argument form of boost::mem_fun exposes the arguments types
> (first_argument_type and second_argument_type) for
> "compatibility" purposes. I was wondering if it were possible
> to expose in general all argument types just like boost::function
> does ( arg1_type, arg2_type, etc..).
>
> Any ideas/comments about this?
I can only add that I've found myself lacking this as well. (My 
workaround is to pass a boost::function type as well, to get the 
signature info. Not nice, but works.)

Cheers,
/Marcus