Re: [boost] boost::mem_fn suggestion/question

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 09:04:13

Marcus Lindblom wrote:
> Piyo wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I was using boost::mem_fun and noticed that only with the 1 or 2
>> argument form of boost::mem_fun exposes the arguments types
>> (first_argument_type and second_argument_type) for
>> "compatibility" purposes. I was wondering if it were possible
>> to expose in general all argument types just like boost::function
>> does ( arg1_type, arg2_type, etc..).
>> 
>> Any ideas/comments about this?

> I can only add that I've found myself lacking this as well. (My
> workaround is to pass a boost::function type as well, to get the
> signature info. Not nice, but works.)

Can you please show some use cases for this?