From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 08:16:43
Neal Becker wrote:
>> The complete documentation starts at:
> Thanks - but I'm looking for a random generator. I don't see this in
> the math_toolkit - am I missing something?
> I do realize that inverse cumulative could be used, which I think
> math_toolkit provides, but that's not always a good choice.
Correct, in general the random number library is a much better bet for, um,
> BTW, the binomial_distribution provided by boost::random is pretty
Unfortunately the library as a whole has a number of outstanding issues that
need fixing... there was talk of a replacement at one point (for TR2) but I
don't know how that's progressing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk