From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 17:06:09
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
> All I'm saying is that it may be best to specify the bugs that need
> fixes, and refuse *all* other checkins, or else things will get out
> of hand again.
That's my point. It's not feature checkins that let things get out of hand in the first place.
> (I for one have checked in a small backport this morning
> to boost.python, assuming the 1_34 branch was now being prepared for
> 1.35, as discussed by Doug et al. some weeks ago.)
And this was a bad idea. RC_1_34_0 is frozen and will only be open to bug fixes that are
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk