From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-17 02:28:47
on Wed May 16 2007, "Dean Michael Berris" <dmberris-AT-friendster.com> wrote:
> Might make sense, if the intention was to make CMake a viable option
> (and not replacement) for Boost.Build in the first few Boost releases.
The intention is to make it a replacement, or there's little point.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk