From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-17 06:45:43
On 5/16/07, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Wed May 16 2007, "Dean Michael Berris" <dmberris-AT-friendster.com> wrote:
> > Might make sense, if the intention was to make CMake a viable option
> > (and not replacement) for Boost.Build in the first few Boost releases.
> The intention is to make it a replacement, or there's little point.
Now the question is when CMake is used as a replacement, do we want
that immediately in the next release? Or would it be something that
could wait over a couple of releases gradually phasing out BBv2?
-- Dean Michael C. Berris http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/ mikhailberis AT gmail DOT com +63 928 7291459
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk