From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-18 17:06:58
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> Not to throw dirt at GNU Make, but it's just too hard and too painful
> to maintain complex project builds with it. Whether by hand or with
> Compare that to the trivial Jamfiles that are smart enough to figure
> out what to do when you say:
> exe main : main.cpp ;
FWIW, that can be done with gmake, too. E.g. I do things like this in my
foo_sources = foo.cpp bar.cpp baz.idl
apps = foo
and get some level (*) of cross-platformness, too.
You can't say cross-platform builds like that aren't possible with
gmake. It takes time to develop the harness, but that's true with any
Note, I'm not suggesting a switch to make-based systems here.
Boost.Build seems to be pretty well developed and a switch back to
square one of a different basic build system would not earn us anything.
*) "some level" because I have a set of platforms to support that is
significantly smaller than Boost.Build's range of platforms. However, I
think anything that can be done with bjam could be done with gmake, too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk