From: Johan Nilsson (r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-22 08:09:05
Anthony Williams wrote:
> "Johan Nilsson" <r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> IIRC we earlier discussed checking for a valid TSS index before
>> calling TlsSetValue when in the cleanup_slots context.
> That was when you suggested calling TlsSetValue *after* cleanup slots
> --- at which point the TSS index may not be valid. In cleanup_slots
> (where it is now) it is always valid, so we don't need the check.
>> [A bit off-topic] Is it intentional to have the 1.34.1 updates go
>> under the RC_1_34_0 branch?
Isn't it a bit illogical to have 1.34.1 go under RC_1_34_0 (with emphasis on
the trailing zero)?
> Attached is a revised patch.
Ok, applied and retested. Looks good.
FWIW, I vote to accept it.
Thanks / Johan
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk