From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-22 08:16:18
Johan Nilsson wrote:
>>> [A bit off-topic] Is it intentional to have the 1.34.1 updates go
>>> under the RC_1_34_0 branch?
> Isn't it a bit illogical to have 1.34.1 go under RC_1_34_0 (with emphasis on
> the trailing zero)?
Yes, it is. Nevertheless, there's a tradition to do it that way for
Boost. I hope this will get fixed by the new procedures, too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk