Boost logo

Boost :

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-22 08:16:18

Johan Nilsson wrote:

>>> [A bit off-topic] Is it intentional to have the 1.34.1 updates go
>>> under the RC_1_34_0 branch?
>> Yes.
> Isn't it a bit illogical to have 1.34.1 go under RC_1_34_0 (with emphasis on
> the trailing zero)?

Yes, it is. Nevertheless, there's a tradition to do it that way for
Boost. I hope this will get fixed by the new procedures, too.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at