Re: [boost] [optional] Making optional more debugger friendly

From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-23 04:37:52

Ulrich Eckhardt skrev:

> I'm not against making things debugger-friendly, but not at the cost of 
> performance. Also, I find the objections about having different layouts 
> valid.
> 
> Other than that, I know that at least GDB and MS debugger can be scripted and 
> that it might be a different approach that is non-intrusive.

I think this is the way to go. We should somehow have a standard 
repository for these scripts ... they are useful for a number of other 
libraries that are hard to debug, eg. boost.ptr_container, 
boost.variant, boost.any etc

-Thorsten