Re: [boost] interest in container_traits

From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-23 06:33:10

Christian Holmquist wrote:
> So, would a more correct implementation of is_container forward declare STL
> containers in a portable way and specialize the traits class for each one?

That seems reasonable.

> I'm working with STLport and VC 7.1/8.0 so I can have the forward
> declarations working for these, but I don't know about other stl
> implementations.

<boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp>
has some forward declarations.
libstdc++ debug mode would be trouble?

Regards,

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame