Re: [boost] interest in container_traits

From: Christian Holmquist (c.holmquist_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-23 12:03:14

<boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp>has some forward
declarations.
<libstdc++ debug mode would be trouble?

I found more forward declarations in
boost/functional/detail/container_fwd.hpp, and this one seems to get the job
done.
Maybe this file could be moved into boost/detail/ instead?

Besides, it seems to me that boost/functional/hash could be one possible
client of a is_container function,
but I haven't looked very closely though so I could be mistaken.

Regards,

On 23/05/07, shunsuke <pstade.mb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Christian Holmquist wrote:
> > So, would a more correct implementation of is_container forward declare
> STL
> > containers in a portable way and specialize the traits class for each
> one?
>
> That seems reasonable.
>
> > I'm working with STLport and VC 7.1/8.0 so I can have the forward
> > declarations working for these, but I don't know about other stl
> > implementations.
>
> <boost/lambda/detail/operator_return_type_traits.hpp>
> has some forward declarations.
> libstdc++ debug mode would be trouble?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Shunsuke Sogame
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>