From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-25 09:59:31
troy d. straszheim wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:37:37AM -0400, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>> So where should that stuff go? I'm accustomed to having "sandbox"
>>> identify a free-form area. 'sandbox-branches' isn't appropriate
>>> either. I think the current sandbox should actually be a subdirectory
>>> of sandbox called "projects".
> A rephrase of the question: where should this stuff that isn't boost
> libraries go? A new directory? What to call it?
I have an 'xml' project that lives in sandbox/xml. I think that is in line
with your suggestion of having sandbox/X be independent projects (for any
value of 'X').
> But the conventions explicitly prohibit independent versioning of
> projects in an organized way.
How so ?
> This page:
> Does not account for how one should branch/tag/trunk one's project in
> the sandbox independently of the others.
It simply doesn't talk about versioning / branching at all. This doesn't
imply that the whole sandbox has to be branched as a whole. I'm pretty sure
everybody agrees that versioning should be by project, as far as the sandbox
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk