From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-02 10:53:30
Phil Richards wrote:
> I would have thought that the obvious(!) thing to do (after the move
> to subversion, when such thinhgs will be easier) is to say that when
> there is a breaking change to an interface that other libraries rely
> on, then that work *must* be carried out on a branch, and that branch
> is only a candidate for merging back to the trunk when all affected
> libraries have been updated.
This will effectively block all breaking interface changes. The affected
libraries will never be updated if there are no test failures.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk