From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-04 09:55:04
Phil Richards wrote:
> On 2007-06-04, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Heh, if this is an opportunity to change the numbering, let's get rid
>> of that 'major version' entirely, i.e. make the next release '35'.
>> There is nothing versions 1.x and 1.y have in common for x != y, so
>> the '1' is completely meaningless at this point.
> Fine, but why skip to 35? 2 is the number that comes after 1, and the
> fact that we are currently at 1.34 doesn't mean that 34 means *that*
> much. There are only going to be questions about "what happened to
> boost 2.x to 34.x, eh?"
> Or, in other words, what I said before :-)
But it is the 1 that has lost meaning, not the 34. Moving from 1.34(.1)
to 2, 3, etc. sounds more confusing (disruptive) than moving to 35, 36, etc.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk