Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-04 09:55:04

Phil Richards wrote:
> On 2007-06-04, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> Heh, if this is an opportunity to change the numbering, let's get rid
>> of that 'major version' entirely, i.e. make the next release '35'.
>> There is nothing versions 1.x and 1.y have in common for x != y, so
>> the '1' is completely meaningless at this point.
> Fine, but why skip to 35? 2 is the number that comes after 1, and the
> fact that we are currently at 1.34 doesn't mean that 34 means *that*
> much. There are only going to be questions about "what happened to
> boost 2.x to 34.x, eh?"
> Or, in other words, what I said before :-)

But it is the 1 that has lost meaning, not the 34. Moving from 1.34(.1)
to 2, 3, etc. sounds more confusing (disruptive) than moving to 35, 36, etc.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at