From: Stefano Delli Ponti (stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-04 10:21:48
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> But it is the 1 that has lost meaning, not the 34. Moving from 1.34(.1)
> to 2, 3, etc. sounds more confusing (disruptive) than moving to 35, 36, etc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk