Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-06 08:40:52

on Mon Jun 04 2007, "Gennadiy Rozental" <> wrote:

>>>> I understand that this mindset may be unusual. Still, I find the idea
>>>> that
>>>> the trunk is assumed to be unstable a bit odd. The trunk should be
>>>> stable
>>>> and everyone should work to keep it that way.
>>> If trunk is stable, how do I test my development?
>> If trunk is not stable, what motivation do you have for testing your code?
> I don't care about trunk in general at all. I don't believe we need a notion
> of boost trunk whatsoever.

I've been asking myself why we're still talking about a "trunk," too.
Can somebody explain why, and what it's supposed to mean?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at