From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-06 08:40:52
on Mon Jun 04 2007, "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental-AT-thomson.com> wrote:
>>>> I understand that this mindset may be unusual. Still, I find the idea
>>>> the trunk is assumed to be unstable a bit odd. The trunk should be
>>>> and everyone should work to keep it that way.
>>> If trunk is stable, how do I test my development?
>> If trunk is not stable, what motivation do you have for testing your code?
> I don't care about trunk in general at all. I don't believe we need a notion
> of boost trunk whatsoever.
I've been asking myself why we're still talking about a "trunk," too.
Can somebody explain why, and what it's supposed to mean?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk