Re: [boost] Boost Development Environment proposal

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-06 08:40:52

on Mon Jun 04 2007, "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental-AT-thomson.com> wrote:

>>>> I understand that this mindset may be unusual. Still, I find the idea
>>>> that
>>>> the trunk is assumed to be unstable a bit odd. The trunk should be 
>>>> stable
>>>> and everyone should work to keep it that way.
>>>
>>> If trunk is stable, how do I test my development?
>>
>> If trunk is not stable, what motivation do you have for testing your code?
>
> I don't care about trunk in general at all. I don't believe we need a notion 
> of boost trunk whatsoever. 

I've been asking myself why we're still talking about a "trunk," too.
Can somebody explain why, and what it's supposed to mean?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com