Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-07 08:58:32

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> IMHO testing release, and then debugging failures with the debug
> builds is the way to go. The current behavior of testing debug, and
> not testing release is highly suspect to me.

We've had cases in the past where a release build works while a debug build
leads to an internal compiler error. Of course we also had cases where a
debug build works and a release build crashes. So to be on the safe side we
really need to test both.

I agree that if we have to pick one, release makes more sense from a QA
perspective. It's a lot slower, though.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at