From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-10 14:47:20
Sunday, June 10, 2007, 6:47:18 PM, you wrote:
> On 6/10/07, Matias Capeletto <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > bm::value_type
> Today is definitely not my day... lets try one last time:
> left : is the left element
> right : is the right element
> info : is the information, that do not participate in the set
As I've said, there are two problems with these:
1. bm::value_type is dependent on bm which is both Boost.Bimap and my
component implementation detail. I don't want to put that dependency
on the user's code.
2. left, right and info members are not self-explaining to users.
There is no left or right side of my component.
This might be better if bimap allowed to express relations between
opaque structure members, something like:
unsigned int ID;
set_of< string, WildcardOrder >,
unordered_set_of< unsigned int >,
left_is< MyData, string, &MyData::Wildcard >,
right_is< MyData, unsigned int, &MyData::ID >
But I guess, that leads us to Boost.MultiIndex.
> Very sorry :(
Don't mention, it happens. :)
-- Best regards, Andrey mailto:andysem_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk