From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-10 19:25:47
Robert Ramey wrote:
> We have a well defined structure. It may not be optimal - but
> that's another issue. As far as I'm concerned, SVN vs CVS
> totally separate from Beman's proposal. Given all the
> opportunities/issues raised by a move to SVN, maybe
> the change to SVN should be postponed until Beman's
> proposal is impemented.
No ! Since, as you say, the SVN <-> CVS change is orthogonal
to the rest, and since changing structure is *much* more easy
in SVN, there is no reason not to start with the SVN move.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk