Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-10 19:25:47

Robert Ramey wrote:

> We have a well defined structure. It may not be optimal - but
> that's another issue. As far as I'm concerned, SVN vs CVS
> totally separate from Beman's proposal. Given all the
> opportunities/issues raised by a move to SVN, maybe
> the change to SVN should be postponed until Beman's
> proposal is impemented.

No ! Since, as you say, the SVN <-> CVS change is orthogonal
to the rest, and since changing structure is *much* more easy
in SVN, there is no reason not to start with the SVN move.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at