Re: [boost] a new release of "Join" asynchronous concurrency library

From: Yigong Liu (yigongliu_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-11 11:19:24

Thanks for the suggestions. First I thought about physically remove "Boost"
prefix from the name (and have done it to my website). Your suggestions
sounds better, so i can keep the name while adding a notice in header in the
doc saying "it is not boost library yet...".

On 6/11/07, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/10/07, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Since no one has mentioned it before
> > > <http://www.boost.org/more/discussion_policy.htm#lib_names>.
> On 6/11/07, Yigong Liu <yigongliu_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reminder. I'll remove "Boost" from the library name.
> >
>
> Quoting from the linked page:
>
> "Note that this policy only applies to discussions, not to the
> documentation, directory structure, or even identifiers in the code of
> potential Boost libraries."
>
> So I think that keeping that name in the library and in the
> documentation (maybe modulo a notice that says that the library has
> not yet been accepted) is fine. You just need to say "the proposed
> Boost Join library" when discussing it on the mailing list or
> elsewhere.  May be that was exactly what you meant, but I just wanted
> to clarify.
>
> HTH,
>
> gpd
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>