Re: [boost] Languishing review requests

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-13 17:16:51

on Wed Jun 13 2007, "more effective thinking in the exceptional C++ programming language" <effective.thinking-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to give my testimonial on this point...
>
> A few days ago I subscribed to this mailing list because I wanted to share
> with the boost community the results of my experiments with the
> random_on_sphere distribution. I uploaded a ready to read pdf file with the
> method, the results and a proposal to modify the current implementation
> (that is 20 times slower than it could be)...
>
> I expected a quick decision since I took the pain to make everything clear
> in the document. I did not understood anything to what happens here. I got
> some feedback from users of the mailing list and that's it! Nobody took the
> formal review in charge.

Did you realize that it's too early to ask for a formal review?

There are 4 steps in our process before formal review should be
requested: http://www.boost.org/more/submission_process.htm

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com