Boost logo

Boost :

From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-14 10:30:19

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Jun 13 2007, "more effective thinking in the exceptional C++ programming language" <> wrote:
>> I would like to give my testimonial on this point...
>> A few days ago I subscribed to this mailing list because I wanted to share
>> with the boost community the results of my experiments with the
>> random_on_sphere distribution. I uploaded a ready to read pdf file with the
>> method, the results and a proposal to modify the current implementation
>> (that is 20 times slower than it could be)...
>> I expected a quick decision since I took the pain to make everything clear
>> in the document. I did not understood anything to what happens here. I got
>> some feedback from users of the mailing list and that's it! Nobody took the
>> formal review in charge.
> Did you realize that it's too early to ask for a formal review?
> There are 4 steps in our process before formal review should be
> requested:

Does a new implementation of the uniform random distribution on a sphere really require a formal review?
Couldn't just the maintainer of the Boost.Random library decide whether to incorporate this code
into the library?

Johan Råde

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at