Re: [boost] Boost documentation format (was Re: Boost documentation)

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-25 16:50:18

"Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:e9b043a10706251340v7132cad1sc95d2122e36b16d9_at_mail.gmail.com...
> On 6/25/07, Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> "Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> news:e9b043a10706250954m11a04762mc5c1cfc6d7429ebe_at_mail.gmail.com...
>> > On 6/25/07, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >> At least there seems to be a consensus about what boost's scope / 
>> >> focus
>> >> should be.
>> >> That's a good starting point. :-)
>> >
>> > Having a common look & feel for docs and good tools for navigate them
>> > should be part of boost scope.
>>
>> If you want this to become part of boost scope, submit it for review.
>> You can't just develop staff and make everyone start using it. Please 
>> don't take
>> this statement as diminishing your efforts - it's just how boost work (or 
>> I
>> thought it is).
>
> I am not forcing anyone to do nothing. I am working in this project
> because I think it will be very good for boost future. Others seem to
> think that way too, because now there are a bunch of people working
> behind scene.
>
> I will very happy to submit all this work for review when it is ready.
> I am working hard so the review process will be painless. You can take
> a look at our wiki page:
> http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/ImprovingBoostDocs
>
> We are taking this project very seriously (while having a fair amount of 
> fun)

Well. Maybe we can ask review wizard for some priority handling. It 
shouldn't be difficult to find review manager.

Gennadiy