Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-14 07:23:39

Next message: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] RFC: Boost.XML API prototype in the sandbox"
Previous message: Corrado Zoccolo: "Re: [boost] Monotone phasing out use of bits of boost due to having tobuild external libraries"
In reply to: Matt Calabrese: "[boost] Atomic Operations Library"
Next in thread: Matias Capeletto: "Re: [boost] Atomic Operations Library"

Matt Calabrese wrote:

> For a while I was considering just working on an implementation of N2324,
> but I personally am not a fan of its design choices and felt that this
> library may be better for my own personal needs. If others don't feel the
> same, I'll just leave this library internal to my own and continue on.

From reading the documentation for a few minutes, I already find it
quite better than N2324, personally.

Next message: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] RFC: Boost.XML API prototype in the sandbox"
Previous message: Corrado Zoccolo: "Re: [boost] Monotone phasing out use of bits of boost due to having tobuild external libraries"
In reply to: Matt Calabrese: "[boost] Atomic Operations Library"
Next in thread: Matias Capeletto: "Re: [boost] Atomic Operations Library"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk