Boost logo

Boost :

From: Cory Nelson (phrosty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-15 23:43:47


On 7/15/07, Steve Trutane <trutane_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On this recent slashdot thread, there seems to be more griping than
> advocacy regarding Boost and template metaprogramming:

I'd say that any uglyness in Boost's code will be in the
implementation - specifically hacks for compatibility with old or
buggy platforms. If conforming C++09 compilers were ubiquitous, Boost
would start looking a lot better. But that is many years off :/

> Any "Pretty" Code Out There?
> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=250311&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=19862839
>
> Just wondering if the Boost devs have any words of wisdom on this matter.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Cory Nelson
http://www.int64.org

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk