From: Cory Nelson (phrosty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-15 23:43:47
On 7/15/07, Steve Trutane <trutane_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On this recent slashdot thread, there seems to be more griping than
> advocacy regarding Boost and template metaprogramming:
I'd say that any uglyness in Boost's code will be in the
implementation - specifically hacks for compatibility with old or
buggy platforms. If conforming C++09 compilers were ubiquitous, Boost
would start looking a lot better. But that is many years off :/
> Any "Pretty" Code Out There?
> Just wondering if the Boost devs have any words of wisdom on this matter.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Cory Nelson http://www.int64.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk