From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 10:23:13
on Wed Aug 01 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
> Beman wrote:
>> Right. Again, for avoidance of doubt: do you expect the development
>> branch to be created from the stable branch, to make sure a passing
>> test on the development branch translates to a passing test on stable
>> after a merge. Correct ?
> Now you've hit upon the motivation for my original post. I was under
> the impression that the "trunk" would be the last released version. It
> turns out that its not so. But no matter. With SVN there is no special
> status accorded "trunk" we can just branch off the last release. The
> only think we need is a set of "Best Practices" (or whatever one
> wants to call it so we're all in sync.
Ummm, so is that a "yes" or a "no?"
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk