From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 11:56:52
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Aug 01 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
>> Beman wrote:
>>> Right. Again, for avoidance of doubt: do you expect the development
>>> branch to be created from the stable branch, to make sure a passing
>>> test on the development branch translates to a passing test on
>>> stable after a merge. Correct ?
>> Now you've hit upon the motivation for my original post. I was under
>> the impression that the "trunk" would be the last released version.
>> It turns out that its not so. But no matter. With SVN there is no
>> special status accorded "trunk" we can just branch off the last
>> release. The only think we need is a set of "Best Practices" (or
>> whatever one
>> wants to call it so we're all in sync.
> Ummm, so is that a "yes" or a "no?"
Yes, I expected that the RC_1_34_0 would become the new "trunk"
and that individual developers would merger their changes
from the "old trunk" into their development branches as needed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk