From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 03:51:35
Steven Watanabe <steven <at> providere-consulting.com> writes:
> Alexander Nasonov <alnsn <at> yandex.ru> writes:
> > Actually, this contruct has a limitation too. In some cases, typename
> > is required:
> > ...
> Can't you use the same mechanism that you use
> to avoid typename for the plain typeof?
Sure, thanks for the hint.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk