|
Boost : |
From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-22 15:41:06
AMDG
Alexander Nasonov <alnsn <at> yandex.ru> writes:
> Actually, this contruct has a limitation too. In some cases, typename
> is required:
>
> template<class T>
> void foo()
> {
> T& (*function_tag)() = 0;
> typedef typename remove_reference<BOOST_TYPEOF(function_tag)>::type sig;
> }
>
Can't you use the same mechanism that you use
to avoid typename for the plain typeof?
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk