From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 12:08:50
Wouldn't generally accepted SVN setup be:
/trunk (same as current trunk)
RC_1_35_1... (snapshot when tarball is created)
RC_1_35 (next release in being updated)
Nicola Musatti wrote:
> Beman Dawes <bdawes <at> acm.org> writes:
>>> Did you consider a more traditional svn structure of:
>>> trunk/ (boost-root)
>>> RC_1_35_0_n/ (boost-root)
>>> 1_35_0/ (boost-root)
>> No, that approach didn't occur to me. I think I like it slightly
>> better than my proposal.
>> Anyone else have an opinion on this?
> I take it that svn/boost/release/trunk would correspond to 'next' in
> your document. In this case I'm all for this setup.
> Nicola Musatti
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk