Re: [boost] Updated Development and Release Practices for 1.35.0

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 12:14:38

on Thu Aug 23 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't generally accepted SVN setup be:
>
> svd/boost
>      /trunk (same as current trunk)
>      /tags
>          RC_1_35_1... (snapshot when tarball is created)
>      /branches
>           RC_1_35 (next release in being updated)
>           joe_shmoes_library_development
>           ....

Yes, that would be usual, and it's roughly what I was going to suggest
(the tag RC_1_35_1 should be something like 1_35_1a1, because we may
end up releasing multiple release candidates for a given Boost
version).  Is there a good reason not to follow it?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com