Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-23 12:14:38

on Thu Aug 23 2007, "Robert Ramey" <> wrote:

> Wouldn't generally accepted SVN setup be:
> svd/boost
> /trunk (same as current trunk)
> /tags
> RC_1_35_1... (snapshot when tarball is created)
> /branches
> RC_1_35 (next release in being updated)
> joe_shmoes_library_development
> ....

Yes, that would be usual, and it's roughly what I was going to suggest
(the tag RC_1_35_1 should be something like 1_35_1a1, because we may
end up releasing multiple release candidates for a given Boost
version). Is there a good reason not to follow it?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
The Astoria Seminar ==>

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at