From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-31 20:36:13
> [Did I already suggest something like this?...]
> The Wave preprocessing tool can accept locations for a
> compiler's system header files. I think the C++ standard
> allows the standard headers to not be implemented as
> conventional files. I'm wondering if we can do that, as an
> experiment. In other words, the Wave library could have an
> option to inject our version of idealized renditions of the
> standard headers directly into the token stream, without
> referencing actual header files. This could catch bugs that
> assume certain things about actual header files that wouldn't
> be present in our version.
This sounds - hmmm - interesting.
> Our standard headers could be in the form of a collection of
> functions, one for each compiler item (function, type,
> object, template, macro, etc.). Those functions would be
> passed in a level of expression (declaration in a secret
> __boost_std namespace, injection of declaration into the std
> namespace, full definition in __boost_std namespace [or no
> namespace for macros]) and a descriptor of the environment
> (bits per byte, bytes per short/int/long, 2/1-complement or
> sign-mag, etc.). An inclusion function for each header would
> call the inclusion functions for each contained item, but
> only up to the lowest level required.
Could elaborate, please? Somewhere midsentence you lost me here. Can you
give an example, how you envision this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk