Boost logo

Boost :

From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-29 07:55:16


Simon Carter wrote:
> Nicola Musatti <Nicola.Musatti <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hallo,
>> I'd be interested in knowing which version of Boost do people use with
>> which version of the Borland/CodeGear compilers. The reason I'm asking
>> relates to the state of Boost regression tests for the version currently
>> being developed, as can be seen here:
>> http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/summary.html
>>
>
> We're stuck at 1_30_0 with BCB6. Did try moving to 1_32_0 but the (admittedly
> small) effort of maintaining 1_32_0 with spirit 1_6 was deemed unnecessarily
> error-prone in a multideveloper environment. Similarly, we don't use any
> non-header-only libraries; the configuration pain is not worth the effort when
> we have a fair code library of our own which has some overlap with boost.
>
> Since we've got to change compiler anyway we're moving to C# for the bulk of our
> work.

I am always amused when a C++ programmer, who is going to be using .Net,
says they have to change compilers and then mentions they will be using
C#. Are you aware that a C++ implementation for .Net already exists
called C++/CLI and that you can directly used Boost code using C++/CLI
in mixed mode programming under .Net ?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk