From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-03 20:04:25
> Why not use approach similar (if not based upon) named function parameters:
> throw my_error().data(( tag_errno = errno, tag_name = name, .... ))
That's not bad at all, and seems totally possible. Thanks for the suggestion.
> I also strongly in favor boost::optional instead of pointer result type.
What is the problem with the pointer?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk