Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vladimir Batov (batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-05 17:47:09

Yeah, I surely looked at that one first back then when it was submitted and
now and I mention that in my original post. The major issue with Asger
Mangaard's implementation was that in order to generalize he had to
sacrifice the very reason the Pimpl existed -- opaqueness of implementation


----- Original Message -----
From: "François Duranleau" <duranlef_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: An attempt to generalize the Pimpl idom with properly separated
interface and implementation

> [snip]
> There has once been a submission about pimpl to Boost:
> It was refused. I can't comment any further because I didn't really follow
> the reviews, but you can have a look in the mailing list archives.
> --
> Francois Duranleau

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at