From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-09 10:57:11
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> To the moderators on the list:
I'll take that...
> I'm not sure how the subversion access
> works, but will it be alright if this library continues to get
> developed in the sandbox? Is there a specific process for that?
Yes, this is the point of the sandbox. More details at
Basically you need to send the moderators and email and we will send you an
invite for sandbox svn access.
> would this be a candidate for a mini-review once the appropriate
> documentation and "boostification" process gets done? Or would this
> merit a full review just like the other libraries that try to become
> part of the Boost C++ Library?
Not sure yet on that -- it has to be a fairly small utility to be a
mini-review. In it's an existing library extension the current library author
may just accept it as an extension and add it to the library. Not sure how
this really fits yet...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk